Publication support
Case title pending
Placeholder: e.g. "Manuscript rejected twice for structural issues; restructured and accepted in a Q1 journal after one revision round."
Scientific writing with structural clarity
Well-written science isn’t a concession. It’s the standard.
We write, edit and validate scientific communication — for researchers publishing their work, biotech teams building authority, and digital health products whose claims need to hold. The distance between what your data says and what your audience understands: that’s where we work.
3 specialists — science, writing, strategy
Spain · Ireland
English · Spanish · Català
What we do
Three lines of work.
One standard.
Anyone can write with AI. Few can tell you whether the science behind your message is actually defensible.
Why Iridis
The colour is in the structure, not the surface.
The hummingbird’s green is not pigment — it is structure. A scientific text works the same way: the same data can dazzle or go unnoticed depending on how it is built.
Structural clarityThe argument and the hierarchy of evidence are what a reviewer, an investor or a client reads first.
The gapBetween what a study says and what a headline reports. We close it without losing rigour.
Precision in flightThe hummingbird hovers perfectly still — controlled force. Rigour and clarity enable each other.
The manuscript · same finding, two texts
"A statistically significant trend towards amelioration of the evaluated parameters was observed in the intervention cohort, which could potentially suggest therapeutic implications that may warrant further exploration in subsequent investigations."
This is what we do: close the gap between the data and its reading.
The product claim · same app, two messages
"Our AI optimizes your nervous system through vagus nerve activation."
From our science validation line — claims that survive a clinician’s reading.
Get started
Tell us what you need to communicate.
A 30-minute call, no strings attached. We arrive with questions, not a catalogue.
Services
Three lines of work.
One standard.
Every deliverable starts from the same principle: the structure does the work. We don't sell words — we build and verify arguments that hold up in front of a reviewer, an investor or a feed algorithm.
01
Publication support
From data to accepted manuscript. We work with your results and your team so the paper says exactly what the evidence allows — and reads the way it deserves.
Medical writing
Peer review
- ManuscriptsFull papers from data and protocol: IMRaD structure, results narrative, honest discussion. Substantive editing of existing drafts too.
- ReviewsNarrative and systematic reviews: search strategy, evidence synthesis, and a structure that earns the citation.
- Responses to reviewersPoint-by-point letters that concede what should be conceded — and defend what shouldn't.
- Journal submission packagesCover letter, formatting to journal requirements, graphical abstract and highlights. Ready to submit.
02
Scientific content & medical communications
Your team knows the science. We turn it into material that builds authority over time: for clients, for investors, for the field. Judgement, not just presence.
- White papersResearch, argument structure and writing. The long document is where credibility is won — and it works for years.
- Technical blogs and newslettersRecurring editorial content a scientist can read without raising an eyebrow.
- LinkedIn ghostwritingPosts and articles for founders, researchers and company pages — written in your voice, from interviews and your own material.
- Scientific decksPitch and conference presentations: the science first, the design in service of the argument.
03
Science validation & evidence audit
AI made building health products easy. It did not make the science behind them reliable. Before your app, landing page or pitch deck reaches users, investors or clinicians, we check whether the claims, the references and the evidence actually support what the product says.
- Scientific claim auditWe review your web, app copy or deck and map every claim against the available evidence. Deliverable: claim matrix with risk levels and reformulations.
- Evidence mappingThe science behind your product, module by module: what's supported, what's extrapolated, what would need a study. Deliverable: evidence dossier.
- Scientific positioning & messagingRewriting claims and narrative so they sound credible because they are credible — no pseudoscientific shortcuts.
- Pre-launch scientific reviewClaim audit + evidence mapping + user-flow review, combined, before you go to market.
| Product claim | Evidence | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| "Improves sleep quality" | Indirect studies; acceptable if qualified | Defensible |
| "Reduces anxiety" | Weak or extrapolated evidence | Needs rewording |
| "Detects early signs of depression" | Requires clinical validation | Medical device territory |
Excerpt from a claim matrix — the core deliverable of a claim audit.
Anyone can write with AI. Few can tell you whether the science behind your message is actually defensible.
What this is not: a regulatory certification or legal assessment. We provide scientific, evidence-based review of product claims, messaging and supporting literature. For MDR or AI Act compliance, we'll tell you when it's time to bring in regulatory counsel — and we'll have done the groundwork they need.
Doesn't fit neatly in a box?
Almost nothing does. Write to us with what you have — a dataset, an idea, a half-finished draft — and we'll tell you how we would approach it.
Work
Selected work
A sample of recent projects across our three lines. Much of what we write is published under our clients' names or protected by confidentiality agreements — these cases are anonymised, and we're happy to discuss relevant examples in detail on a call.
Publication support
Case title pending
Placeholder: e.g. "Response to reviewers for a contested methods critique — all major points resolved without additional experiments."
Content & medcomms
Case title pending
Placeholder: e.g. "White paper for a biotech platform company — now their most-requested sales document, 18 months on."
Content & medcomms
Case title pending
Placeholder: e.g. "Six months of LinkedIn ghostwriting for a healthtech founder — follower growth metric, inbound leads metric."
Science validation
Case title pending
Placeholder: e.g. "Claim audit for a sleep app pre-launch — 14 claims mapped, 3 flagged as medical device territory, all reformulated."
Science validation
Case title pending
Placeholder: e.g. "Evidence dossier for a wearable's HRV-based features, used in the company's Series A data room."
A note on what you don't see here. Ghostwritten content carries our clients' names, and most validation work is covered by NDAs. That is the nature of the job — the work disappears into the client's voice. References available on request.
Publications
Peer-reviewed work we've supported
Papers where our contribution is acknowledged or where authors have agreed to be listed as references. List pending — entries will follow standard citation format.
- 202XAuthor A, Author B, et al. Title of the publication pending. Journal Name. DOI pending.
- 202XAuthor C, Author D, et al. Title of the publication pending. Journal Name. DOI pending.
- 202XAuthor E, et al. Title of the publication pending. Journal Name. DOI pending.
About
Three people. One shared standard.
Iridis was born from the conviction that well-written science is not a concession to popularisation: it is the standard to aspire to. We are a small team on purpose — every project goes through the same hands that scope it.
The name
IRIDIS
Latin genitive of iris: "of the iris", "of the rainbow". In scientific nomenclature, the genitive is the standard form. Three readings in a single word:
Iridescence
The hummingbird's structural colour. Not pigment: construction. Like a good text.
Iris
Precision of vision. Seeing clearly what the data says — and what it doesn't.
Iris, the messenger
The bridge between science and those who need to understand it.
The team
Who we are
Complementary profiles: science, writing and strategy.
Photo pending
Name Surname
Role · Specialty
Short bio: background, years of experience, therapeutic areas or sectors of expertise. Two or three lines at most.
Photo pending
Name Surname
Role · Specialty
Short bio: background, years of experience, therapeutic areas or sectors of expertise. Two or three lines at most.
Photo pending
Name Surname
Role · Specialty
Short bio: background, years of experience, therapeutic areas or sectors of expertise. Two or three lines at most.
How we work
Small on purpose
No middlemen
You talk to the person who writes
There are no account managers between you and the text. The person who understands your project is the one who writes it.
Rigour first
We don't write what the data doesn't say
If the evidence doesn't support the claim, we'll tell you before a reviewer does. It's cheaper that way.
A clear process
Fixed quotes, real deadlines
Scope defined per deliverable, revision rounds agreed up front, no surprises on the invoice.
Bilingual
English and Spanish, native to the field
We write directly in the target language. We don't translate: we write.
Contact
Tell us about your project
We reply within 48 working hours. If you have a draft, a dataset or a link, even better: we'll arrive at the call with our homework done.
Before you write
Three things that speed up any quote: what you need (type of deliverable), by when, and for which audience. With that, we can give you a range in our first reply.
Emailhello@iridis.— (pending)
Based inSpain · Ireland · remote
LanguagesEnglish · Español · Català